US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 10,384
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CLARK v. USA
as 4:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
FREDDIE CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
POPE v. COOPER et al
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE WAYNE POPE
Defendant:
DEPUTY COOPER, DEPUTY ROSS, DEPUTY FRITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. ROWE
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
DEVONTAI NATHANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
OFFICER BLAKE ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SNYDER v. SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ERIC EUGENE SNYDER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BORIUDIN, LIEUTENANT BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN, Lieutenant HARBERT, Sgt MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
