U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,791
HAMILTON v. WORTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2025cv00016
Plaintiff:
RICARDO HAMILTON
Defendant:
DEPUTY DAVID SHELER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. BURDEN
as 4:2025cv00031
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
TOM BURDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. WYATT
as 4:2025cv00030
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
MALIK WYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. BROWN
as 4:2025cv00029
Plaintiff:
WARREN PASCHAL, JR
Defendant:
Nurse DOMINIQUE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOOD v. EMMERT et al
as 5:2025cv00029
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY DEANDRE FLOOD
Defendant:
T EMMERT and LT BRIAN BLANTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2025cv00008
Petitioner:
MELVIN JAMES JACKSON
Respondent:
KEVIN SPROUL and SHERIFF TERRON HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EZELL v. FENNELL et al
as 5:2025cv00022
Defendant:
AUSTIN CRAIG FENNELL and DAMON OZELEK
Plaintiff:
KIRBY VAN EZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADFORD v. SALES et al
as 5:2025cv00023
Plaintiff:
AVERY BRADFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, DEPUTY WARDEN DESIRE JONES, OFFICIAL TYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. NAIL et al
as 4:2025cv00019
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, MICHAEL NAIL, KIARA WASHINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2025cv00011
Petitioner:
KENYOTTA B HARVEY
Respondent:
ERIC BRYANT and SUMTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
