US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 5,816
Sifuentes v. State of Georgia
as 4:2023cv00286
Petitioner:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Odum
as 2:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Randal Lee Brooks
Respondent:
Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underwood v. Bodiford
as 1:2023cv05479
Petitioner:
Travon De'Aundre Underwood
Respondent:
Michael Allen Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paschal v. Coleman
as 3:2023cv00227
Petitioner:
Edward Paschal
Respondent:
Jeff Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whiting v. Sampson
as 1:2023cv05406
Petitioner:
Preston Whiting
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Warden Gregory Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv05405
Petitioner:
Christopher T. Freeman
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv05347
Petitioner:
Luis Alfonso Nunez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fox v. Pineiro
as 1:2023cv05327
Petitioner:
Michael D. Fox
Respondent:
Aaron Pineiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrell v. Oliphant
as 1:2023cv05315
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Morrell
Respondent:
Warden Calvin Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Nelson
as 1:2023cv05286
Petitioner:
Ronnie Williams
Respondent:
Dennis S. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
