US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 22,175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Taylor v. Talton
as 5:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Cullen Talton
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Pennycuff
as 5:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Greg Pennycuff
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Floyd v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00257
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00082
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Spivey v. Nettles et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Ashley Nettles, Ramsey Bennett, Gregory Sasser and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Wayne Spivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Ameer Moore
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia and Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Simmons v. Oge et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Defendant:
The City of Brunswick, Georgia and Marc Oge
Plaintiff:
Darion L. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00211
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher Fitzgerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
