Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 8,564
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Webber v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.C. v. Broce et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
R.C.
Defendant:
Candice Broce and Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
Daniels v. Aqua Midtown
as 1:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Daniels
Defendant:
Aqua Midtown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Butler v. Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Randy Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jenee Jones and Linda T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. American Income Life et al
as 1:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
American Income Life, AO Premier, American Income Life Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STAGGERS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHARRARD STAGGERS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CANDICE BROSE, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
Everett v. McCall
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Steven Everett
Defendant:
Wyatt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. SHIVER et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
JOEY DIXON
Defendant:
BLAKE SHIVER and GEORGIA STATE PATROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
