Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 23,245
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant:
TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Lowe v. City of Manchester, Georgia et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tameka Lowe
Defendant:
City of Manchester, Georgia, Chris Carpenter and Jason Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Shiver et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joey Dixon
Defendant:
Blake Shiver and Georgia State Patrol Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Barton Wade
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Officer H. Crouch and Officer M. Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kavanagh v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Leslie Kavanagh
Defendant:
Timothy Smith and Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
