Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 11,536
Crump v. McFarlin
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Unnamed
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
James Edward Lackey, Jr.
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Swaney et al
as 2:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Terrell Mack
Respondent:
Warden Swaney and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01063
Petitioner:
Justin M. Moore
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez-Alvarez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01064
Petitioner:
Argentis Martinez-Alvarez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collins v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Randy H. Collins, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oliver v. Warden, FCI Jesup Prison
as 2:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Quinton Lamont Oliver
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Switzer v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv01018
Petitioner:
Steven Switzer
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
