District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 81 - 90 of 168,942
United States of America v. Obradovich
as 4:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Obradovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Arline v. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00090
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Whittle
as 1:2024cv00231
Respondent:
Sheriff Whittle
Petitioner:
Zachary Alan Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lyons v. Whittle
as 1:2024cv00232
Respondent:
Sheriff Whittle
Petitioner:
George Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Watts v. Whittle
as 1:2024cv00233
Respondent:
Sheriff Whittle
Petitioner:
Phillip Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinson v. Whittle
as 1:2024cv00235
Respondent:
Sheriff Whittle
Petitioner:
Anthony Geno Martinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geno Martinson
Defendant:
Captain Sherman, Lieutenant Wilson and Major Askew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. McFarland et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison, Keelumn, Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Marion Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv05789
Plaintiff:
Felisha Pitts
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Towns et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05802
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and PepsiCo, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Reko Towns and Eddie Towns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
