District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 131 - 140 of 163,492
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Roger Ussery
Respondent:
State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOUGLAS v. AMMONS
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
MELISSA A DOUGLAS
Defendant:
Judge G WAYNE AMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. BARNHART
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Infosys McCamish Systems, LLC
as 1:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
Kelly Collins
Defendant:
Infosys McCamish Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Turner v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Latonia Turner
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Brian K. Widener and Saleha Holding LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Warren v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02129
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Warren
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LANGHAM v. HUNT
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DALE LANGHAM
Defendant:
DR CYNTHIA HUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NelNet Program et al v. Dooley
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
NelNet Program and Antonio Deshone Dooley
Defendant:
Antonio D. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
