US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 810
Powers v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv04160
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
A Cobb, Paula Lodge and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Donathan
as 4:2022cv04153
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Gregg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Hendrix et al
as 4:2022cv04151
Plaintiff:
Mario Diaz
Defendant:
M Hendrix and Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jumper et al
as 4:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, A Cobb and A Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kugler v. Donathan et al
as 4:2022cv04138
Plaintiff:
Devin Kugler
Defendant:
Gregory Donathan, Erin Posey, William Epperson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Donothan
as 4:2022cv04137
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Greg Donothan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Shah et al
as 4:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, IDHS/TDF Medical Director and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2022cv04130
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, Ashley Adwell and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Lodge et al
as 4:2022cv04131
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paula Lodge and Shan Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smego v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2022cv04125
Defendant:
Sheila Walters, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Greg Donathan and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Smego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
