US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,829
Lewis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Agualar Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seats v. Doty et al
as 3:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Devin C. Seats
Defendant:
B Doty, Anthony Wills and Lt Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Gary
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Boyd, III
Defendant:
Deputy Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Watson et al
as 3:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
James A. Savage
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Tammy Grimes, J Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
Willie B Bates, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smtih v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
James Smtih
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Childes et al
as 3:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Childes, Jason Dunn and Wexford Health Source
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Rob Jeffries, Matthew Swalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
