US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 9,829
Mitchell v. Gregory
as 3:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Fredd B. Mitchell
Defendant:
Dennis A. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and Unknown IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00860
Petitioner:
Ronnie Maurice Jones
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Jake Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Anthony Wills, Connie Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plumlee v. Drew
as 3:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Robert L Plumlee, II
Defendant:
Jason Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Sandhu et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Kerry Coley
Defendant:
Dentist Sandhu, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Vinyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Shan Crump
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
J.C. Bryant, III
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Pulaski County Dentention Center, Pulaski County Dentention Center Medical Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
