Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 16,443
Sorrell v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Sorrell
Defendant:
Julio Garcia, Donald Cunningham and Village of University Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weinhaus v. Scannicchio et al
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Edward "Coach" Weinhaus
Defendant:
Regina A Scannicchio and Illinois Judges Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Perez
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Finley v. Hulu et al
as 1:2024cv03083
Plaintiff:
Akiya Finley
Defendant:
Hulu, Shonda Rhimes, Raamla Mohamed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Coyle v. Harr et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jessica Coyle
Defendant:
Ross Harr, Kyle Cruz and City of Peoria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aponte et al v. Bradley et al
as 1:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Pedro Aponte and Kate Diaz
Defendant:
Trooper Kevin Bradley and Unknown Trooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington Sr. v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Mario Devonne Washington Sr.
Defendant:
Nathan Lewis, Kyle Winbigler, Kevin Legate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Rakeem Harris
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, Nicholas Doage, Jeff Linden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Washington v. City Colleges of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02989
Plaintiff:
Takela Washington
Defendant:
City Colleges of Chicago and Ana Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Yamamoto v. The Children's School
as 1:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Mika Yamamoto
Defendant:
The Children's School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
