U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Torts - Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Doe v. Rees

as 3:2025cv00133
Defendant:
Jonathan Rees, Greg Ellis and Jonny Rees
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Keane v. Keane et al
as 3:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
John Keane
Defendant:
Sharon E Keane and Janmarie Schnabel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Meshberger v. Wright et al

as 1:2024cv00371
Defendant:
Tracy Wright and S&L Enterprises I, LLC
Plaintiff:
James L. Meshberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2461 Recovery Funds or Property
Everwise Credit Union v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Everwise Credit Union
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wilson v. Strzyzewski
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilson
Defendant:
Richard Strzyzewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hart et al v. Harper et al
as 2:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kim Hart and Gary Goldman
Defendant:
Rita Harper, Janet M. Sherrod and Pearl Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
New v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Robert New and Rob New
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Weiskopf et al v. Tiny Cocoons, Inc. et al

as 4:2023cv00071
Defendant:
Yinan Liu, Tiny Cocoons, Inc., Chloe and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weiskopf and Elizabeth Weiskopf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Corbin v. Jensen

as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Danial Corbin
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
INDIANA v. TikTok Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
TikTok Inc and ByteDance Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.