US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,014
Brown v. South Bend Housing Authority
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant:
South Bend Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vowal v. Martinez Jr et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Williman Mescall, Willeman Forgey, Oscar Martinez Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Vowal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Freeman v. Eaton
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
de Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Villegas v. Hancock Regional Hospital
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Melissa Villegas
Defendant:
Hancock Regional Hospital doing business as Great Lakes Healthcare Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. John
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Greene
Defendant:
John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bundy v. Dollar Tree
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Bundy
Defendant:
Dollar Tree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Treadwell v. Walkerton Police Department
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tanishia Treadwell
Defendant:
Walkerton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Leed et al v. Pitney et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Cody Leed, Kimberlie Mollette and Aiden Manges
Defendant:
Matthew Pitney, Matthew Hassell, Marshall County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cowles v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Cowles, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Indiana State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Majestic Care Center et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Teddie B Jones and Teddie Jones
Defendant:
Majestic Care Center, David Early, Mike Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
