US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 141 - 150 of 9,842
Wilson v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00497
Petitioner: George W Wilson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff: Richard E Johnson, Jr
Defendant: William R Hyatte, Jacqueline Scaife and Robert Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00496
Petitioner: Christina Greer
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelly v. Murray et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00493
Plaintiff: Marzono Shelly
Defendant: Clarence Murray, Mark Watson and Lorenzo Arredando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff: Arliss B Burress
Defendant: Stephanie Taylor and Probation Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson Sullivan v. Sandberg et al
as 2:2022cv00170
Plaintiff: Jordan Jacob Henderson Sullivan
Defendant: Dale Sandberg and Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00482
Petitioner: Rafael L Walker
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00483
Petitioner: Rafael L Walker
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00484
Petitioner: Rafael L Walker
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00485
Petitioner: Rafael L Walker
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?