US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 11,298
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Carlos Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeanay v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Markus Yeanay
Defendant:
Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart II v. Goldsmith et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Robert E Stewart II
Defendant:
Bob Goldsmith, Quality Correctional Care and Thomas Lehman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simbeck v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Galipeau et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
DKari White
Defendant:
Galipeau and Centurion Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simbeck v. Elkhart County, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Defendant:
Elkhart County, IN, Elkhart County Courts, Gretchen S Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simbeck v. Elkhart County, IN et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Defendant:
Elkhart County, IN, Elkhart County Courts, Gretchen S Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Heeg
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Jason Bailey and Jason Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Maxsyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
DKari White
Defendant:
Galipeau and Centurion Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Meier et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
David R. Hall
Defendant:
Debbie Meier, Ashley Tinkle, Kathy Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
