US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 204
HAY v. OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv01815
Defendant:
LYNETTE BARGER, CLIFFTON CARNES, WILLIAM A. HART and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. HAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILSON v. REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2013cv01548
Defendant:
REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff:
SUMMER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HAWKINS v. NEWBURGH HEALTH CARE AND RESIDENTIAL CENTER, INC.
as 3:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
TONJYA HAWKINS
Defendant:
NEWBURGH HEALTH CARE AND RESIDENTIAL CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WEATHERLY v. GODBY HOME FURNISHING, INC.
as 1:2013cv01300
Defendant:
GODBY HOME FURNISHING, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRETT WEATHERLY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
NORRIS v. ALLISON TRANSMISSION, INC.
as 1:2013cv01287
Defendant:
ALLISON TRANSMISSION, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HACKER v. JEFFBOAT LLC
as 4:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
BILLY HACKER
Defendant:
JEFFBOAT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JONES v. REDCATS USA, INC.
as 1:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
CATHY JONES
Defendant:
REDCATS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RENO v. TOWN OF GASTON, INDIANA
as 1:2013cv00944
Plaintiff:
HEATHER RENO
Defendant:
TOWN OF GASTON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SNELL v. SVC MANUFACTURING, INC.
as 1:2013cv00796
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN SNELL
Defendant:
SVC MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
