US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 204
GAGEN v. UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.
as 1:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
RYAN GAGEN
Defendant:
UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
FIELDER v. TRI STAR ENGINEERING, INC.
as 4:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
SHANNON D. FIELDER
Defendant:
TRI STAR ENGINEERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HENSLEY-JOHNSON v. INDIANA MASONIC HOME
as 1:2016cv00131
Defendant:
CHAD DAVIS and INDIANA MASONIC HOME, INC.
Plaintiff:
RHONDA HENSLEY-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SIMMONS v. INDIANA MASONIC HOME, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02023
Defendant:
KATHERINE COOPER and INDIANA MASONIC HOME, INC.
Plaintiff:
DREMA SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MULLEN v. LILLY USA, LLC, et al
as 1:2015cv02007
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROSE MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SCHROERS v. GENCO
as 1:2015cv01970
Defendant:
GENCO I, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SCHROERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
SCHROERS v. GENCO I, INC.
as 1:2015cv01972
Defendant:
GENCO I, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SCHROERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MARSH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
as 1:2015cv01945
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Plaintiff:
LINDA MARSH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
COLWELL v. PMG INDIANA, LLC
as 1:2015cv01907
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH H. COLWELL
Defendant:
PMG INDIANA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
MILLER v. BEACH MOLD & TOOL, INC.
as 4:2015cv00164
Defendant:
BEACH MOLD & TOOL, INC.
Plaintiff:
DORIA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
