US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 202
HAMMOND v. BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00565
Defendant:
BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. and SHELIA STACHURA
Plaintiff:
JONICA HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
HEINKE v. THE ARC OF GREATER BOONE COUNTY, INC.
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
ANGELA HEINKE
Defendant:
THE ARC OF GREATER BOONE COUNTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
MATHER v. MARTIN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2017cv04726
Defendant:
MARTIN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MATHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
ESTREMERA v. BRAMPTON BRICK, INC.
as 2:2017cv00554
Defendant:
BRAMPTON BRICK, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANGEL D. ESTREMERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
INGRAM v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2017cv04011
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL INGRAM
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
CROUCH v. MANAGED HEALTH SERVICES INDIANA
as 1:2017cv03294
Plaintiff:
EMRICH CROUCH
Defendant:
MANAGED HEALTH SERVICES INDIANA, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 FMLA: Enforcement
ARTHUR et al v. FOR BARE FEET INC.
as 1:2017cv02875
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ARTHUR, MAUREEN CRAWFORD, DEBBIE FIELDS and others
Defendant:
FOR BARE FEET INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 FMLA: Enforcement
ANDREWS v. HORIZON BANK
as 1:2017cv02658
Plaintiff:
LISA ANDREWS
Defendant:
HORIZON BANK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
COHEN v. RCI VACATION EXCHANGE, CO.
as 1:2017cv02577
Plaintiff:
CARY COHEN
Defendant:
RCI VACATION EXCHANGE, CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
FIELDS v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
as 3:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
AMANDA FIELDS
Defendant:
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
