US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 202
HART v. UNITED FARM FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a INDIANA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE
as 1:2019cv03142
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HART
Defendant:
UNITED FARM FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a INDIANA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DOSS v. UNION ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS CLINIC, LLC
as 2:2019cv00346
Defendant:
UNION ASSOCIATED PHYSICIANS CLINIC, LLC
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL R. DOSS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CLARK v. M.S.D. OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION, INC.
as 1:2019cv03031
Defendant:
M.S.D. OF LAWRENCE TOWNSHIP FOUNDATION, INC.
Plaintiff:
AIMEE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DAVIS v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY a/k/a GEICO
as 1:2019cv02723
Plaintiff:
RACHEL R. DAVIS
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a GEICO and GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PHILLIPS v. TOYOTA TSUSHO AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2019cv02628
Defendant:
TOYOTA TSUSHO AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRUCE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
JUDAY v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2019cv02593
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Plaintiff:
BECKY JUDAY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
COFFEY v. BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2019cv02532
Defendant:
BEST CHOICE PRODUCTS, INC. and SKY BILLIARDS
Plaintiff:
JENNY COFFEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BARTON v. CARE STRATEGIES LLC
as 1:2019cv02463
Plaintiff:
RACHELLE BARTON
Defendant:
CARE STRATEGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DRANSFIELD v. INTAT PRECISION, INC.
as 1:2019cv02073
Plaintiff:
AARON DRANSFIELD
Defendant:
INTAT PRECISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MITCHELL v. I CAN SCHOOLS, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01744
Defendant:
AETNA HEALTH, INC., INDIANA COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL, INC., PANSOPHIC LEARNING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
