Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 5,093
Scott v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams and Commonwelth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. DPA Office Hopkinsville KY et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
DPA Office Hopskinville KY, Christian County, Darrin Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. A. Vargez et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
A. Vargez, Jordan Rodriguez, J. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Luke Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Kerr et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Neil Kerr, Elizabeth Oneal Teal, County Attorny's Office Logan County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Thurmond and J. Corey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Thurmond and J. Corey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Attorney General Office
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
