Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 5,093
Ray v. Gould
as 3:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Andrew R. Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cope v. Luther Luckett Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Luther Luckett Correctional Complex, Warden Amy Robey, Deputy Security Patricia Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 3:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Ray
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky Parole Board, LB, MJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Nunley
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Cameron A. White
Defendant:
Terry Nunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houchin et al v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Leroy Alvin Houchin, II and Tabitha Bearden
Defendant:
Kevin Williams, Ashland Police Department, Boyd County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
White v. Nunley
as 4:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Cameron A. White
Defendant:
Terry Nunley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hall
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Clayton Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Shawn Embry and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Kelly Whittaker, Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
