US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Romero v. Community Coffee Company, LLC
as 3:2012cv00173
Defendant:
Community Coffee Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nancy Romero
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Romero v. Community Coffee Company, LLC
as 3:2012cv00174
Defendant:
Community Coffee Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Nancy Romero
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hydroflame Technologies, LLC v. Hydroflame Production, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00179
Defendant:
John Does and Hydroflame Production, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hydroflame Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Camsoft Data Systems, Inc. v. Southern Electronics Supply, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01047
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ratner v. J. M. Test Systems Inc
as 3:2008cv00693
Plaintiff:
Cary Ratner
Defendant:
J. M. Test Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broussard et al v. Go-Devil Manufacturing Co. of LA, Inc. d/b/a Go-Devil Manufacturers of Louisiana, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Kyle Broussard and Gator Tail, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Go-Devil Manufacturing Co. of LA, Inc. d/b/a Go-Devil Manufacturers of Louisiana, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gator Tail, L.L.C. v. Mud Buddy, L.L.C. d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing
as 3:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Gator Tail, L.L.C. and Kyle Broussard
Defendant:
Mud Buddy, L.L.C. d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gulfstream Plastics, Ltd. v. T4 Spa Concepts & Designs, L.L.C.
as 3:2007cv00968
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
A + Manufacturing, Inc. v. Welker Engineering Co
as 3:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
A + Manufacturing LLC
Defendant:
Welker Engineering Co
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Universal Restraint, L.L.C. v. Valeda Company LLC
as 3:2005cv01320
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
