U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,268
Smith v. Day et al
as 3:2025cv00129
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Smith
Respondent:
Travis Day, Rayburn Correctional Center and Elizabeth Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2025cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Luker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Officials Employed at the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Nelson Coleman Correctional Center et al
as 3:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kent Taylor
Defendant:
Nelson Coleman Correctional Center, Greg Champagne and Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ranatza
as 3:2025cv00106
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
Sheryl M. Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. USA
as 3:2025cv00107
Petitioner:
Christopher Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ricks v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2025cv00091
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Braxton et al
as 3:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
Justin Spears
Defendant:
Demarcus Braxton, East Baton Rouge Parish Prison, C. Leaders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pooler v. Leblanc
as 3:2025cv00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Pooler
Defendant:
James E. M. Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 3:2025cv00081
Petitioner:
Jock R. Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wooden v. USA
as 3:2025cv00077
Petitioner:
Reshide Wooden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.