US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 696
Jones v. Letcher et al
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones
Defendant:
Keenan Letcher and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Rapides Parish Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Philip Heard
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hotard v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Francis Hotard
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Kling
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Darrin Maurice Miller
Defendant:
Maeghen Kling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Devante Epps
Defendant:
Roderick Brown, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Office of the Sheriff of the East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pea v. Lewis
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Donald Pea
Defendant:
Eric Lewis and Camp D - A Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Daryle Bernard Carter
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Unknown Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Watts
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Jeff Landry and Jason Ard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon, John Bel Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Unknown Accountant Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
