US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,667
Hays v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Hays
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aikens v. Rocket Mortgage
as 5:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Aikens
Defendant:
Rocket Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Earl Hollins
Defendant:
Lt Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abercrumble v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shelton Abercrumble
Defendant:
Warden Bass, Lt Smith and CO Scout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calzada v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Evelio Calzada
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Francis v. Bossier Maximum Security Center Guards
as 5:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Shandrea L Francis
Defendant:
Bossier Maximum Security Center Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez-Ricardo v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Sanchez-Ricardo
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Wyles and Dep Warden Callendar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sledge v. Rayville Police Dept et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Dazzmon D Sledge
Defendant:
Rayville Police Dept, Sheriffs Dept Richland Parish and Unidentified Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
