Maryland Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,876
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Brookside Park Condominiums, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Lester Lee
Defendant:
Brookside Park Condominiums, Inc., Metropolis aka MCM, Inc., Rammy Azoulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 360
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bland et al v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Paula Bland and Jasmine Weaver
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD, Shantel Blanton, Tariq Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Harried v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 8:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Timothy F. Maloney
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD and STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Emiabata v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Charles and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
