US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 280
United States of America v. Deraffele
as 1:2016cv10991
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Deraffele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cherry et al v. Hampton Properties, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv40048
Defendant:
Hampton Properties, LLC and Russell Haims
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dejarnette and Yesica Zayas
Adr_provider:
David Hennessy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Flathers v. Northampton Housing Authority
as 3:2016cv30049
Plaintiff:
Guy Roy Flathers
Defendant:
Northampton Housing Autthority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Taste-Ray v. Ashe et al
as 3:2016cv30043
Plaintiff:
Patricia Taste-Ray
Defendant:
Michael J. Ashe, Jr. , Hampden County Sheriff's Department , Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Enwonwu v. Boston Housing Authority et al
as 1:2016cv10342
Plaintiff:
Leopold O.V. Enwonwu
Defendant:
Boston Housing Authority and Nieves Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Sage Bank
as 1:2015cv13969
Defendant:
Sage Bank
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
S. et al v. Lorilee I, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv30203
Plaintiff:
G. S.
Defendant:
Lorilee I, LLC, Christopher A. Spagnoli, Craig L. Spagnoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
R.H. v. Lorilee I, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv30204
Defendant:
Lorilee I, LLC, Lorilee Property Management, LLC, Christopher A. Spagnoli and others
Plaintiff:
R.H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
J.A. v. Lorilee I, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv30205
Plaintiff:
J.A.
Defendant:
Lorilee I, LLC, Lorilee Property Management, LLC, Christopher A. Spagnoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Montesino v. Bay Cove Human Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv13205
Plaintiff:
Julian Montesino
Defendant:
Bay Cove Human Services, Inc. and Community Based Flexible Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
