US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,390
Bey v. Omelley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10474
Respondent: Judge Daniel Omelley
Petitioner: Rashad Bey
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10409
Petitioner: Rashad Bey, Anthony Guess
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Frank
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCants v. Alves
as 1:2021cv10386
Petitioner: Owen McCants
Respondent: Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horstkotte v. Evangelidis
as 4:2021cv40026
Respondent: Lewis G. Evangelidis
Petitioner: Todd Horstkotte
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sena v. Kelly
as 1:2021cv10358
Respondent: Sheila Kelly
Petitioner: Dennis Sena
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prunty v. Gray
as 1:2021cv10337
Respondent: Dean Gray
Petitioner: Daniel Prunty
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Upton v. Commissioner of Correction
as 1:2021cv10232
Petitioner: Robert Upton
Respondent: Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Libby v. Divris
as 4:2021cv40013
Petitioner: Jeremy Libby
Respondent: Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dowds v. Alves
as 1:2021cv10133
Respondent: Superintendent Nelson B Alves, Nelson B Alves
Petitioner: ROY C DOWDS, Roy C. Dowds
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Warden Boncher
as 1:2021cv10095
Petitioner: Edward Lee Thomas, III
Respondent: Warden Boncher
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?