US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Bureau v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11706
Defendant:
Department of Correction, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Real A. Bureau
Martin v. DeMoura et al
as 1:2020cv11657
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Thomas J. Preston, John Doe
and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney P Martin
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelton v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11705
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pelton, Sr
Ferreira v. Alves
as 1:2020cv11638
Respondent:
Nelson B Alves
Petitioner:
Antonio M Ferreira
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mirabella v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2020cv11520
Defendant:
Dr. Arun Chaudhary, Steven Thompkins
Plaintiff:
Dante Mirabella
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullinan v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2020cv11466
Defendant:
Wellpath, Massachusetts Department of Correction, David Duarte
and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan P Cullinan
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulsey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv11157
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Olin Dale Hulsey
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Vincent v. Sheriff Hodgson
as 1:2020cv11014
Plaintiff:
David M Vincent
Defendant:
Sheriff Hodgson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abarientos v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2020cv10855
Defendant:
Stephen Spaulding, Michael Carvajal
Plaintiff:
Crispin Abarientos
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parra Reyes v. RADM Spaulding Federal Medical Center Devens, MA
as 1:2020cv10793
Defendant:
RADM Spaulding Federal Medical Center Devens, MA
Plaintiff:
Walis Parra Reyes
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
