Massachusetts Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,592
Wojcik et al v. Button
as 4:2024cv40094
Defendant:
ROBERT BUTTON
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. WOJCIK and JEAN A. WOJCIK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Randall v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv11729
Defendant:
Lev, Rudy the Break Dancer, Bishop Darren Simpson and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liu v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
as 1:2024cv11715
Plaintiff:
Xianwen Liu
Defendant:
President and Fellows of Harvard College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pidge v. Healey et al
as 1:2024cv11698
Plaintiff:
Janet J. Pidge
Defendant:
Maura T. Healey, Joshua S. Levy, Andrea J Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kersey v. Chewy Corporation
as 1:2024cv11713
Plaintiff:
George Kersey
Defendant:
Chewy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ra dais deapocalypse bey v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv30083
Plaintiff:
ra dais deapocalypse bey
Defendant:
Springfield Police Department, Officer T. Betancourt, Officer S. Stelzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams-Bariffe v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv30084
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Williams-Bariffe
Defendant:
Justin Baker, Derek Conway, Brendan Dwyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
