Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,013
Davis v. Pike County Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv10583
Plaintiff:
Damion Davis
Defendant:
Pike County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibrahim v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2022cv10569
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Ibrahim, Jr
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado-Maldonado v. F.M.C. Devens
as 4:2022cv40040
Plaintiff:
Jose Maldonado-Maldonado
Defendant:
F.M.C. Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Clemens v. Stewart et al
as 1:2022mc91155
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Clemens
Defendant:
W. Michael Stewart, Amanda O' Shea, Andrew Quigley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. Chelsea Trial Court
as 1:2022cv10481
Plaintiff:
Arev Mock
Defendant:
Chelsea Trial Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10430
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Christian et al
as 4:2022cv40027
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Robert B Christian, Sharlese Horton, Dominique Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Yellin et al
as 1:2022cv10359
Plaintiff:
Forever Al-Mani Hamilton and Jamal Kemo Saunders
Defendant:
Janet L Yellin, Charles Rettig, US Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tottenham v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10347
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Tottenham
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Department of Correction, Dean Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLong v. Dickhaut
as 1:2022cv10309
Plaintiff:
Joseph DeLong
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
