US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 101 - 110 of 124,555
Odeh v. Stiles et al
as 2:2024cv11170
Plaintiff:
Musa Odeh
Defendant:
Nicholas Stiles and Quickway Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. Hood et al
as 2:2024cv11164
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Jones
Defendant:
Charles Overton Hood, Lasalle Bank and Samuel Jackson
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Belleville Lounge LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11161
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Belleville Lounge LLC and Moe Chami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Sahabi Convenience Store, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv11160
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Sahabi Convenience Store, Inc., Opyum Lounge, LLC Doing business as Opyum Lounge, Hossein Sahabi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boeman v. Henry Ford Hospital
as 2:2024cv11169
Plaintiff:
Emily Boeman
Defendant:
Henry Ford Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Emery v. Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation
as 2:2024cv11163
Plaintiff:
Jasmine S Emery
Defendant:
Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation (SMART)
Amir Jones v. Romeo Management Group, LLC dba PUFF Cannabis Company
as 2:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Amir Jones
Defendant:
Romeo Management Group, LLC Doing business as PUFF Cannabis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. The Auto Club Group et al
as 2:2024cv11168
Plaintiff:
Regis Murphy
Defendant:
The Auto Club Group and Unify HR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Loomus v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11162
Plaintiff:
Rachelle S. Loomus
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Henry Ford College Foundation and Memberselect Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
