US District Court for the Western District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 3,627
Ambrose #185357 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Joseph Ambrose #185357
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
North #289996 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
Christopher North #289996
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cherry #322891 et al v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
David Cherry #322891
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore #224339 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
David Moore #224339
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sueing #139068 v. Nagy
as 1:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
Jerome Sueing #139068
Respondent:
Noah Nagy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris #440974 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Dejuan Harris #440974
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #365581 v. Artis et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Smith #365581
Respondent:
Fredeane Artis and Heidi E. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis #227488 v. Horton
as 2:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Earvin R. Davis #227488
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack #661414 v. Burgess
as 1:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
George Michael Mack #661414
Respondent:
Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bravo v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
andrew bravo and Andrew Rolando Bravo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
