US District Court for the District of Minnesota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,952
Wilson-Greenwood v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mia Wilson-Greenwood
Defendant:
Restoration Hardware, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Minnesota School of Bartending
as 0:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Ardell Levert Jenkins
Defendant:
Minnesota School of Bartending
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nelson v. American Modern Insurance Group, Inc., et al
as 0:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Alexander Nelson
Defendant:
American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.,, NCM Insurance Agency and American Modern Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Aikens v. Metz
as 0:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jacob Aikens
Defendant:
Devinn Metz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. John/Jane Doe et al
as 0:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindquist v. Taylor et al
as 0:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, Keith Ellison, Matt Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villebrun v. Nienaber
as 0:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Anthony Randal-Ashley Villebrun
Defendant:
Brandon Keith Nienaber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Hennepin County Child Support & Collections
as 0:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Bailey
Defendant:
Hennepin County Child Support & Collections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vang v. Grundhofer et al
as 0:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ching Vang
Defendant:
Alex Grundhofer, Antonio Rulli and Ramsey County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
