US District Court for the District of Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,737
Murphy v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv02957
Petitioner:
Romel Murphy
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reynolds v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv02956
Petitioner:
Terrell Reynolds
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hartwick v. Eischens et al
as 0:2024cv02877
Petitioner:
William Burt Hartwick
Respondent:
US Bureau of Prisons and B. Eischens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cocuzzi v. Reimann
as 0:2024cv02876
Petitioner:
Michael Cocuzzi
Respondent:
Shannon Reimann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamer v. Segal
as 0:2024cv02886
Petitioner:
Rhonda A. Hamer
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holmes v. County of Ramsey et al
as 0:2024cv02879
Defendant:
John Does 1-14, Jane Does 4-10, Ramsey County Correctional Health and others
Plaintiff:
Stephan Nicholas Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv02880
Defendant:
Gregory LeKatz, Kenneth Peterson, Minnesota Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Lindsey Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Carlton
as 0:2024cv02799
Petitioner:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent:
E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrews v. Carlton
as 0:2024cv02797
Petitioner:
Norris Deshon Andrews
Respondent:
E.K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Raper v. Millender et al
as 0:2024cv02789
Defendant:
Nate Millender, Darren Haugen, Centurion Health Care Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Jeramiah Christopher Raper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
