US District Court for the District of Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,617
Montano v. King
as 0:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Felix Aguirre Montano
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Buckhanan v. USA
as 0:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Xavier Jerome Buckhanan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
White v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
William Demont White, Jr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spottswood v. State of MN Wash Co, The et al
as 0:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Defendant:
The State of MN Wash Co and Zoom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Douglas Latuseck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Balleza v. King
as 0:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Hector Balleza
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monson v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Chad Lee Monson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McClendon v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Douglas Edward McClendon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Monson v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Peter James Monson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.