Minnesota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,937
Laramore v. Old National Bank et al
as 0:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Adrianne L. Laramore
Defendant:
Old National Bank, Regional Manager Kristi Unknown, Branch Manager Goerge Bittar and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Wattleton v. Turner
as 0:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Luke Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Brown et al
as 0:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Asanti Jahi Simmons
Defendant:
Alexander Vladimir Brown and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hedquist v. Goodhue County Sheriffs Department
as 0:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Hedquist
Defendant:
Goodhue County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Private Entities Definitions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moore v. Saint Paul Police Department
as 0:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Mariama Moore
Defendant:
Saint Paul Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
