US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,527
Crowels v. Jasper County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv05070
Defendant:
Jasper County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Johnny Micco Crowels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. USA
as 4:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Randy A. McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Maurizi v. USA
as 2:2024cv04145
Petitioner:
Christina Marie Maurizi
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Glass v. USA
as 6:2024cv03251
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Avery Glass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fisher v. Jackson County Missouri Sheriffs Deputies et al
as 4:2024cv00555
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri Circuit Court, Dean Whipple, Judge Vernon E Scoville, III and others
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Meyers v. USA
as 4:2024cv00540
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew N Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Haxhaj v. Warden
as 6:2024cv03240
Petitioner:
Shpendiim Haxhaj
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Warren et al v. Delay et al
as 3:2024cv05068
Defendant:
Bounous, Brad Delay, Mincey and others
Plaintiff:
Baylen Ash, Austin Collins, Thomas G Warren and others
Petitioner:
James Hougland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv05067
Petitioner:
Travis K. Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Endsley v. Buckner
as 6:2024cv03245
Petitioner:
Steven Endsley
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.