US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 3,204
Weeks v. Brewer
as 5:2022cv06120
Petitioner:
Rubin Rurie Weeks
Respondent:
Superintendent Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv00721
Petitioner:
Zeno E. Sims
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wesley v. Hancock
as 6:2022cv03279
Petitioner:
Shaman Wesley
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03277
Petitioner:
Brian Maloney and Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Letterman v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Brian L. Letterman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Hacker
as 4:2022cv00658
Petitioner:
Rodney Vashon Williams
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorman v. Brewer et al
as 4:2022cv00666
Petitioner:
Alan Gorman
Respondent:
Chris Brewer, Joe Biden, Merritt Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Comstock v. Vandergriff
as 6:2022cv03268
Petitioner:
John Comstock
Respondent:
Teri Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Arnott
as 6:2022cv03264
Petitioner:
Bradley Eugene Bailey
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCartney v. Strid
as 6:2022cv03266
Petitioner:
Rick L McCartney
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
