Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,966
David v. Kaiger et al
as 4:2024cv01354
Defendant:
Michael Kingsbury, Becky Stevens and Randee Kaiser
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Gaden et al
as 4:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Byron T. Gilmore
Defendant:
Steve Brock and Ike Gaden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Jhonny et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Defendant:
C/O Jhonny and C/O Eric
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lee Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Patel et al
as 4:2024cv01324
Defendant:
Judge Kristine Kerr and Bhumi Patel
Plaintiff:
Frederick Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Parham v. Ferrell et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Defendant:
Britton Ferrell and Zachary Matney
Plaintiff:
Julius Parham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Travon D. Johnson
Respondent:
William Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. FCC Coleman I
as 4:2024cv01313
Plaintiff:
Terrick Alfred Williams
Defendant:
FCC Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv01300
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Department of Mental Health
Plaintiff:
Raevon Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Hayward et al
as 4:2024cv01293
Defendant:
Doug Burris, Charles McKnight, Nathaniel Hayward and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Antony Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gastreich v. Bollinger County, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Bollinger County, Missouri, Jackie Wilson, Tom Van Devan and others
Plaintiff:
Kurt Gastreich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
