US District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,835
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ZUPKO v. COUNTY OF OCEAN et al
as 3:2022cv05872
Plaintiff:
RANDI ZUPKO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF OCEAN, SCOTT WATERS, ROBERT GREITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
HERMAN v. SOUTH ORANGE-MAPLEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2022cv05873
Plaintiff:
TAMAR HERMAN
Defendant:
SOUTH ORANGE-MAPLEWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION and FIEDELDEY CONSULTING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2022cv05834
Plaintiff:
RONALD RICKETTS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL COURNEY
as 2:2022cv05835
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL COURNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Doe v. Princeton University
as 3:2022cv05853
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Princeton University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HEDGEPETH v. LIFE INSURANCE PRUDENTIAL
as 3:2022cv05854
Plaintiff:
ERIC HEDGEPETH
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE PRUDENTIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAKELAND BANK
as 2:2022cv05746
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAKELAND BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
