US District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,957
Oliveira
as 3:2023cv20604
Plaintiff:
Danielle Oliveira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANGLEY v. UNITED AIRLINES INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20602
Plaintiff:
BRENDAN LANGLEY
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES INC., UNITED GROUND EXPRESS INC., PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROSASCO v. CRESSKILL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2023cv20605
Plaintiff:
VICTOR ROSASCO
Defendant:
CRESSKILL POLICE DEPARTMENT, CRESSKILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS and BOROUGH OF CRESSKILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VANDEVELDE
as 2:2023cv20499
Plaintiff:
ERIK D VANDEVELDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VANDEVELDE v. PYCH et al
as 2:2023cv20506
Plaintiff:
ERIK D VANDEVELDE
Defendant:
STANLEY PYCHE, STEVEN STROWBRIDGE, JASON DELTURCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JENNINGS v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY
as 1:2023cv20428
Plaintiff:
TYMIRE S. JENNINGS
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WALLER v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2023cv20429
Plaintiff:
KAREN WALLER
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, CHRIS CHRISTIE, JON CORZINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEELE v. MONTES
as 2:2023cv20473
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEY STEELE
Defendant:
ROMAN MONTES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEELE v. MARQUES
as 2:2023cv20474
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEY STEELE
Defendant:
JOANN MARQUES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2023cv20468
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, MONMOUT COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE (MCPO) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
