US District Court for the District of New Jersey Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 333
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SINGH
as 2:2024cv09613
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SURINDER SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
KEILY GROCERY AND DELI, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2024cv08043
Plaintiff:
Keily Grocery and Deli, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $634,778.69 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 393883753, HELD IN THE NAME OF SUPREME STATE LLC
as 2:2024cv07268
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$7,571.49 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN FIDELITY BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 7896, HELD IN THE NAME OF BVP LOGISTICS, INC., $634,778.69 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 393883753, HELD IN THE NAME OF SUPREME STATE LLC and $11,807.08 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 0172, HELD IN THE NAME OF SKYER USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv05863
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT, CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4685 IN THE NAME OF SMART LEARNING, INC., CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0711 IN THE NAME OF HEE AH NAM and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $603,593.90 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4480 HELD IN THE NAME OF DREWSAMEL GROUP LLC
as 2:2024cv02551
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $603,593.90 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4480 HELD IN THE NAME OF DREWSAMEL GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
NAN v. MILGRAM et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
CUNSHENG NAN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ADM GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHA ORTIZ CHERYL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22312
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC and APPROXIMATELY $1,642,755.55 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN F&M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ACCOUNT NOS. 5106230, 200025521, AND 1005278 HELD IN THE NAME OF KENT D. WARNING DBA PAYOFF ACCOUNT SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VARIOUS COUNTERFEIT AUTO PARTS AND JEWELRY
as 2:2023cv04527
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VARIOUS COUNTERFEIT AUTO PARTS AND JEWELRY
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305 Custom Duties:0Forfeiture-Immoral Articles
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 82,656 RED BULL ENERGY DRINKS
as 2:2023cv04183
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
82,656 RED BULL ENERGY DRINKS
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Claimant:
HOWELL IMPORTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305 Custom Duties:0Forfeiture-Immoral Articles
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $318,900 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4146 HELD IN THE NAME OF PRESTIGE SHIPPING INC.
as 2:2023cv02927
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$318,900 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4146 HELD IN THE NAME OF PRESTIGE SHIPPING INC.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.