US District Court for the Northern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,714
Harris v. Lilley
as 9:2023cv01478
Petitioner:
Coreen Harris
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fredricks v. Comstock
as 9:2023cv01422
Petitioner:
Nigel Fredricks
Respondent:
Comstock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Booker v. Noeth
as 9:2023cv01418
Petitioner:
Amin Booker
Respondent:
J. Noeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghinea v. United States of America
as 9:2023cv01411
Petitioner:
Madalin Ghinea
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holley v. Lowerre
as 9:2023cv01434
Petitioner:
LeRoy K. Holley
Respondent:
Ernest J. Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevaro v. Texas State Bar et al
as 9:2023cv01376
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevaro
Respondent:
Texas State Bar and Texas Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanderhorst v. Titus
as 9:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Jah-Lah Vanderhorst
Respondent:
Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorer v. Uhler
as 9:2023cv01292
Petitioner:
DeVonte Moorer
Respondent:
Donald Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. New York State Sentence and Commitment Paper et al
as 9:2023cv01286
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
New York State Sentence and Commitment Paper, New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department Docket #OP2200929 and Judge Murad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
