New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 49,933
Trimm v. New York State Dept. of Corr's and Community Services et al
as 1:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Trimm
Defendant:
New York State Dept. of Corr's and Community Services, Acting Commissioner Denial F. Martuscello, III, Health Commissioner Carol A. Moorse, MD, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nazer v. Manhattan District Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv02713
Petitioner:
Izzat Nazer
Respondent:
Manhattan District Attorney and Warden at Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Volant, et al v. News 12 Long Island
as 2:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Scange Volant and Imani Rochester
Defendant:
News 12 Long Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amirouche v. USA
as 1:2024cv02596
Petitioner:
Larby Amirouche
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jaber v. Shroff et al
as 1:2024cv02608
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
Sabrina Shroff and Federal Defenders of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carzoglio v. Klimek et al
as 1:2024cv02654
Plaintiff:
Angelo Carzoglio
Defendant:
Stanley Klimek, James McMahon, Kevin Krebs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Saracina v. Papia
as 6:2024cv06199
Plaintiff:
Scott Saracina
Defendant:
Stephen Papia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Kortright et al
as 9:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
L. Kortright, L. Lilly and G. Jergdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. USA
as 1:2024cv02555
Petitioner:
Daniel Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
