US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 4,331
Rodriguez v. Roberson et al
as 5:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Trudy Williams Roberson and North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones
as 7:2023cv01675
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Trey Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Thornton, et al
as 7:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Trey Jones and Antonio Trey Jones
Defendant:
Mr. James Haywood Thornton, Mr. William T Brady, Andrew Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
