US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,446
Alvarado v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02264
Petitioner:
Merced Alvarado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Washington v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02262
Petitioner:
Walker Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kelly, Captain Chase, Lt. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McPherson v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02263
Petitioner:
Aaron McPherson
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Futrell v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02258
Petitioner:
Jule C. Futrell
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haugabook v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02259
Petitioner:
Cornell Haugabook, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Carver
as 5:2023hc02257
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Ben Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Heckard
as 5:2023hc02256
Petitioner:
Mack D. Barton
Respondent:
Warden Katrina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02255
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lamons v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02254
Petitioner:
Turhan Lamons
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simpson v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02253
Petitioner:
Jameil L. Simpson
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
