US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,523
Williams v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02139
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Brandon Monquee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gossett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02138
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
William Edmond Gossett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Spillane v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02137
Respondent:
Warden Heckard
Petitioner:
Charles Spillane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moss v. North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02136
Petitioner:
Antonio Bey and Antonio Moss
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moss v. Johnston County et al
as 5:2024ct03179
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bey and Antonio Moss
Defendant:
Johnston County, Johnston County Detention Center and North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crudup v. USA
as 5:2024cv00422
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Crudup, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pineda v. USA
as 5:2024cv00421
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Heidi Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02135
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baker v. Washington et al
as 5:2024ct03177
Defendant:
Inmate Medical Services, Captain Washington and Kenny Shepard
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mooney v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024ct03178
Defendant:
Warden Parker, Officer Chapelle, Officer Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
